Showing posts with label hazard tree. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hazard tree. Show all posts

Sunday, September 15, 2013

That's going to be trouble...

When assessing a tree's risk of failure we must sometimes look for the finer signs and symptoms that may indicate a tree's potential to fail.  The convenience of giant decay conks, broken roots, and huge decayed cavities may not always be evident on a tree that presents a high risk of failure.

Let's look at some pictures of a tree that from a distance may seem fine, but upon closer inspection proved to be cause for alarm.

Notice the soil heaving on the tension side of the lean.

Saw dust or frass present on several areas around on the lower trunk.  When sounded with a hammer decay was detected.

Small armillaria fruiting bodies protruding from the root flare of the tree on the tension side of the lean.  Armillaria root rot is a serious structural root decaying fungus which results in a white rot.

From a distance this willow oak has a perfectly green and balanced canopy, and is in a beautifully maintained yard.  Upon closer inspection the tree described above displays some serious evidence of strength loss.  Further proof that when walking a property, we can take nothing for granted.

Sunday, August 4, 2013

'Crispy black stuff'

Wood decay fungi come in many shapes and sizes.  Their fruiting bodies are generally pretty easy to identify.  Mushrooms and conks along the base of a tree or attached to the trunk can be eye catching.  One commonly over looked and miss identified structural root/basal decay fungi is Brittle Cinder Fungus (Kretzchmaria deusta  formerly Ustulina deusta).  Brittle Cinder causes a soft rot that breaks down cellulose and hemi-cellulose followed by lignin.  This creates a decay that leaves wood feeling brittle.  Early stages of this decay can be hard to detect with a traditional 1/8th-inch bit and drill.

Perhaps the hardest part of identifying this decay fungi is simply noticing it.  Brittle Cinder fruiting bodies first appear as grey-white masses growing only slightly raised from the bark of the tree.  At first sight, they may be mistaken for dead lichens.  As the fruiting bodies mature, they become black and appear as burned bark.  Deusta means 'burned up.'  Unlike most common wood decay fungi, Brittle Cinder is an Ascomycota versus a Basidiomycota.

Brittle Cinder affects a vast array of tree species,including; beech, oak, maple, and linden.  Infection usually occurs through wounds in the bark.  Brittle Cinder can result in significant strength loss, so careful consideration should be taken if this fungus is located on a tree.


Here, Brittle Cinder is growing on the root flare of a red maple.  There is only 1.5-inches to 0-inches of sound wood around the affected area.

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Conservation Arboriculture: It's About to get Weird

Conservation arboriculture sees trees as more than just landscape fixtures, but as whole ecosystems, and argues for the intrinsic value of the macro and microscopic organisms living within mature and veteran trees.   Last week a buddy of mine forwarded me a whitesheet by Neville Fay on retrenchment pruning.  This form of management is a concept practiced in conservation arboriculture.

When trees are damaged in nature it`s usually due to some catastrophic event (i.e. severe wind storm). Branches damaged in this way have wood fibers break and tear, while bark is pulled away from limbs and jagged stubs are left behind. In the aftermath all manner of fungi and arthropods make a home in the tattered remains.  Fungi feed on the newly exposed wood, insects eat the fungi, birds eat the insects, and so on.

In landscapes, trees eventually mature to where their risk of failure reaches a threshold that some mitigating action must take place.  For conservation arborists, this is where retrenchment pruning comes in.  By using coronet cuts to mimic naturally damaged limbs after reduction pruning, conservation arborists invite the natural order of things to take place.  Another technique, natural fracture pruning, is simply tying rope to branches and applying force until the branch breaks. This seems to be most popular in the UK, but I've seen coronet cuts used at The Capilano Suspension Bridge in North Vancouver, British Columbia.

Coronet cut in action. Pic from David Humphries  http://arbtalk.co.uk/forum/climbers-talk/12943-coronet-pruning.html
Final coronet. Pic from David Humphries  http://arbtalk.co.uk/forum/climbers-talk/12943-coronet-pruning.html
Obviously this isn't for everyone, or every tree.  In fact, retrenchment pruning seems to go against all traditional pruning techniques and goals.  This concept isn't meant for the feature tree in the average front yard.  But, this may be appropriate for that mature tree in the wood-line at the back of a property which poses a hazard to the swing set.  This idea may also work for any veteran tree that has fallen into the spiral of decline.  In the Capilano Suspension Bridge example, entrenchment pruning was used on declining trees along forested walkways before they became hazards.

Another thing to keep in mind, retrenchment pruning in its idealistic form can take decades of management.  Vigorous sprout growth can result from damaged limbs, and so with this form of tree management. Talk about commitment from both arborists and tree owners.  The long-term goals of all invested parties need to be discussed before this type of work is performed.

To learn more about entrenchment pruning and conservation arboriculture check out Tree Works Environmental's website: http://www.treeworks.co.uk/press_releases_publications.php

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Not to Kick You when You're Down, but another Incredible Tree Failure


I always hate seeing a tree fall, but sometimes there is no better way to learn about the way trees grow than from a post failure forensic investigation.  And while I know our last post was about a fantastic large tree failure, this was too good to pass up.

Our subject is a large mature willow oak that suffered a tremendous root plate failure.  This tree was growing in a known flood plain, and was one of the tallest trees on the block.


Notice the amount of standing water in hole left behind when the roots pulled from the soil.  Keeping the size of the root plate in mind, and the proximity to the camellia in the picture below, notice how the wet conditions allowed the roots to be pulled from underneath soil like a magician pulling the table cloth from a fully set table.


The only indication of decay at time of failure was a cavity along the lower trunk/root flare of the tree.


Now, here is a part of the tree we don't get to see often.  With the root flare up ended we can see the structure and arrangement of the structural root system, and associated decay.


The decay column moving upward in to the stem is a common occurrence in many tree species.  It is a result of the original tap root dying off and allowing a path for decay to move into the stem.  This is a process that can take years, if not decades.  In species that compartmentalize well it is just a peripheral event, but for poor compartmentalizers, it may the defining defect in their demise.


Good thing the Jeep was insured.


Sunday, March 10, 2013

Anatomy of a Tree Failure

All trees will eventually fail.  By observing tree structure, site conditions, work history, signs of decay, etc. we may glean some insight as to how likely failure will occur in a given time period.  Let's use the following example as a case study for likelihood of tree failure.

The specimen is a mature willow oak with a 30%-40% lean towards the North East.  Prevailing winds usually blow in from the South West.  The site is several yards from a creek that is known to flood, and the area received several inches of rain over the past few weeks.  Primary power lines are close to the tree. Utility pruning has been performed on the subject for decades, leaving an uneven crown with weight distributed on the leaning portion of the stem.


Upon closer examination Inonotus dryadeus conks are present on the tension side of the lean on the root flare.  Inonotus causes a white rot in the lower stem and structural roots of trees, and is common on willow oaks in this geographic area.  Resistance drilling tells us that up to 50% of the root flare is compromised by some form of decay/damage.
 

Finally, a live structural root, also located on the tension side of the lean, is cracked all the way through.



The culmination of these defects resulted in whole tree failure with property damage (thankfully, no one was injured).  The tree failed in the direction of the lean.


Notice the extensive root decay.



Here we can see partial root place failure due to wet soils.


This tree is an almost text book example of a high risk of failure tree, with final results as such.  As defects compound so does likelihood of failure.  That being said, I have participated in workshops where the same high risk of failure tree has been used for years, and still stands to this day.  Assigning risk and predicting failure is one of the hardest things we do as arborists.  Documentation and communication is key.  


Sunday, November 25, 2012

Structural Root Decay: Another Reason to not be a Fan of High Nitrogen Fertilization

While browsing through Fungal Strategies of Wood Decay in Trees by Schwartze, Engels, and Mattheck, I came across an interesting piece of information.  The authors state decay progresses faster in wood with higher concentrations of nitrogen (N).  They then imply a correlation between high N fertilization and increased amount N in structural roots.  If these hold true applying fertilizers high in N, like many commercial tree and lawn companies, will actually speed up wood degradation by fungal decay agents and increase the risk of tree failure.

Now in cases where known root decay is present but not at the point where removal is considered necessary, some tree managers will recommend tree fertilization in an attempt to out grow, or at least stay pace with, the decay.  If the proper fertilizer analysis is not recommended we may actually be speeding up the decay process.  Custom fertilizing based upon the results of a soil sample is really the best practice when specific tree health goals are priority.

Mmmm nitrogen.

Friday, October 19, 2012

Trees Don't want to Die: A Musing

Trees have been around for millions of years, and they have found ways to survive outside in all kinds of conditions. We as humans try to understand why trees die and fail, and how to predict these events. Along the way our industry has come up with 'rules of thumb' to help us predict this. We hear arborists reference numbers like 30%, 33%, or 70% to quantify chances of tree failure or death, but trees break these rules on a daily basis.

There are 'high risk of failure' trees, condemned years ago, still standing today.  These trees have stood through wind and storms which have toppled other trees.  I've seen mature oaks with more than 50% of their trunk circumference damaged from the ground to 20-ft up the stem that are green and vigorous, and which have had enough energy to form callus tissue around the damage.

My view is becoming not, 'we have this much strength loss,' but instead 'we have this much strength left.'  And the same when it comes to the vascular tissue.  We must realize, of course, that some of this will be species, condition, and site dependent.  But, if a tree has 32% of it's root-flare compromised by decay is it a moderate risk of failure, while at 33% it is a high risk of failure?  Or, is what matters the 2 or 3 root flares not damaged are strong enough to support the weight of the tree even if even if all the other flares were compromised? How long will a tree with 50% of the stem girdled maintain a health canopy? 1yr, 5yrs, or 10yrs?  These are the questions I ask myself, because I don't want to remove a tree until it is necessary  and most of my clients feel the same way.



Notice how this tree has fallen completely over, and yet it continues to put out growth maintained by just a small portion of vascular tissue.

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Tree Root Failure: A Discussion

Earlier this week an arborist friend and I were discussing root failure.  The discussion revolved around, if roots were severed, which direction would the tree fall.  His argument was the tree would fall towards the severed roots, while my argument was the tree would most likely fall away from the severed roots.  I believe my argument, the tree would most likely fall away from the severed roots is supported by a publication from the University of Georgia Root Strength  & Tree  Anchorage.

Root failure occurs in association with wind load and gravity.  'Beyond the root plate area, root tensile strength becomes more critical to anchorage.'  That is, as the wind blows roots on the wind ward side of the tree, the tension roots, are doing the most work.  Relatively speaking of course.  If these roots should be severed or damaged the tree would fail in on the opposite side of the force, or away from the root damage. Mattheck describes the roots on the tension side of the tree as forming holding knots in the soil.  Again, considering damage to the tension side of the tree will give a hint to where the tree may fall.

In addition to these references, I have also seen trees that are root decayed fall opposite the decay.  Now I could be wrong in my conclusion, but I think I make a pretty good case.  Some other interesting information from the UGA publication:

-'To summarize, a few large diameter and long roots can not provide effective resistance to failure.  It is in the proliferation of smaller roots in consolidation of the root plate which provides anchorage success.  (Stufka & Kodrik 2008)'

- 'Compression strength increases for a short distance from the stem base before declining with length.  Root compressive strength was found to be roughly the same for angiosperms and gymnosperms, but bending strength was found to be much greater in angiosperms. (Stokes & Mattheck 1996)'

-'Anchorage is concentrated in two general locations around a tree base: 1)  close to the stem base on the
leeward side and focused on several large diameter roots; and,  2) farther away from the stem base on the windward side in many, smaller, large surface area, near-surface roots.  (Danjon et.al. 2005)'

-'Windward roots have forces applied which are concentrated approximately 1.5X (one and one-half times) farther away from the stem base than leeward roots.  (Stokes 1999)'

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Armillaria: Tree Failure

Armillaria, or honey fungus, is a genus that covers several species of soil born root decay fungi.  The common name is derived from the yellow-orangish mushrooms depicted in the pictures below.  Armillaria causes a white rot, which like Inonotus (as described in an earlier post) begins by breaking down lignin and in advanced stages breaks down cellulose and hemicellulose.   

While white rots are usually described as slow moving decay organisms, Armillaria is noted as being more aggressive in its attack on tree structure.  Armillaria gets its other common name 'black shoe string fungus' from the black mycelial fans it puts out to devour wood.  Unlike other structural root decay fungi, Armillaria also can affect the vascular system of the tree, so early signs of infection may be noticed by a decrease in tree vigor and poor tree health.

The pictures below show what happens to trees in advanced stages of Armillaria infection.

The yellowish orange mushrooms of Armillaria protruding from the bark on  the lower stem of the tree.


Notice the tell tale black mycellium penetrating the wood fibers of it's victim.

Monday, September 17, 2012

Reduction of a Silver Maple

I am a firm believer that we can save more mature trees with defects.  Large mature trees provide us with a higher quality of ecosystem services than small trees.  I am not saying we shouldn't be planting trees, but what I am saying, is there are options for retaining our larger trees that some would consider a hazard.

The pictures below are case in point.  This silver maple, thought of as a weak wooded species, has a large cavity in the lower stem, and several decayed root flares.  Three years ago, instead of removing the tree, a drastic crown reduction was performed.  Over all crown weight and height was reduced, not topped out.  The tree still stands today, now shorter, but better protected by wind and weather by its neighboring mature trees.  The concept is basic, shorter and lighter objects are less likely to fall over.

I tell everyone the same thing, "trees don't want to fall over." But, as with everything tree species, age, size, and vitality play into whether or not this is an appropriate treatment based upon the perceived defects.

The arrows point out specific large pruning cuts 



Sunday, September 16, 2012

Topped Beech

Simply stated, it should be a crime to top a European beech.

I still love the irony that people think they are making the tree 'safer,' even though the sprouts that form as a panic response are more prone to failure. Boo to this homeowner and what ever hack did the job.